Corrupt DOJ says criminal White House can ignore impotent Congress

Much as we learned how it pays to stack the Supreme Court with like-minded ideologues, it pays to fill the Department of Justice with those who are loyal Bushies.

Can we call it a Constitutional crisis yet? Or have we moved past that?

Justice Dept. to White House officials: Ignore Congress

WASHINGTON — In a broadly worded legal opinion, the Justice Department has concluded that President Bush’s former top lawyer, and possibly other senior White House officials, can ignore subpoenas from Congress to testify about the U.S. attorneys affair.

The three-page opinion raises questions about whether the Justice Department would prosecute senior administration officials if Congress voted to hold them in contempt for not cooperating with the investigation into the firing last year of eight top prosecutors.

The opinion was prepared this week by the department’s Office of Legal Counsel, in response to questions from former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers, who was subpoenaed to testify Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee. Miers told the panel in a letter faxed Tuesday night that she would not be appearing, citing the Justice memo and advice from the White House.

And as if to show his true grasp of the law when it comes to himself and his fellow blue bloods, here’s what Bush had to say today about the Libby pardon*:

“And, you know, I’ve often thought about what would have happened had that person come forth and said, ‘I did it.’ Would we have had this, you know, endless hours of investigation and a lot of money being spent on this matter?”

He’s thought about that. Often.

*Whatever

–WKW

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under 07_wolfrum

5 responses to “Corrupt DOJ says criminal White House can ignore impotent Congress

  1. In a broadly worded legal opinion, the Justice Department has concluded that President Bush’s former top lawyer, and possibly other senior White House officials, can ignore subpoenas from Congress to testify about the U.S. attorneys affair.

    Wow. I mean…wow.

    Fucking wow.

    What the fuck?

    Goodbye, America. It was nice knowing ya.

  2. Glazius

    . . .

    Department of Justice says: perfectly legal to stonewall investigations of corruption in the Department of Justice!

    And that’s it. Where else can you go? Can the Supreme Court help with this?

    –GF

  3. If I were a criminal, I would make whatever I could legal to keep myself out of trouble.

    Indeed, SCOTUS can help with this. Unfortunately, the deck has been stacked and they will probably make it illegal to talk about the President and his people in anything other then terms of praise and gratitude

  4. jahf

    Can we call it a Constitutional crisis yet? Or have we moved past that?

    Way passed. The case was decided against the republic when Bush stole into office and was subsequently confirmed by the thing most feared by the founding fathers of the country–tyranny of the majority.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s