“Worth the risk?”: How the media chooses between sponsorship and the truth

The Bullpen of New York University’s Department of Journalism provides an illustrative tale for anyone wondering about the lack of coverage of the LaVena Johnson case in the mainstream media. Alexandra Zendrian recounts a sobering story told by Vanessa Bush, executive editor of Essence:

Sometimes conflicts of interest arise when editors plan to run a story that involves an advertiser. Bush shared one such situation with students. The story in question was a wrongful death case involving the U.S. Army. Essence wanted to run an article in their February 2006 issue about Private First Class LaVena Johnson, who the Army said had shot and killed herself. But Johnson’s family was convinced that she had been brutally beaten, and intended to bring a wrongful death case against the Army. Because the Army is one of Essence’s biggest advertisers, the magazine had to consider whether running the article was worth the risk of losing the Army’s valuable advertising dollars.

In the end, they struck a compromise: the Army agreed to continue advertising in Essence and simply pulled their ads from that month’s issue. But it was a close call, Bush said, adding that “advertisers will walk away in a heartbeat.”

It is to the credit of Essence and its editors that the story made its way to print, but the “closeness” of the call is troubling. It is disturbingly easy to imagine other media outlets choosing to look the other way, ignoring LaVena’s story in the name of advertising dollars.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under 02_waveflux

3 responses to ““Worth the risk?”: How the media chooses between sponsorship and the truth

  1. Melissa McEwan

    the “closeness” of the call is troubling

    Indeed. It’s an interesting thought, too, that we’re suddenly seeing lots (and lots and lots and lots) of Army advertising these days not just because they’re desperate for new recruits (which was evident), but because they’re buying precisely this kind of editorial control.

  2. Wow, good catch.

    (It also reminds me of why it’s so important that NPR and PBS be good media outlets, not that they’re completely immune from pressure, nor infallible.)

  3. Older

    So all the government needs to do to shut down real reporting is take out advertisements . . . “It’s a Joy to Pay Taxes at Your All-New IRS!” “This Program Brought to You by the Army Corps of Engineers” Look for the USDA Label”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s